
Sunday, February 28, 2010
A little bit more on environment...

Tuesday, February 23, 2010
My Avatar
Monday, February 22, 2010
The Environment
Artificial Intelligence
I don't think that jealousy is the issue in question, but fulfilling what we program it to do. David is designed to love, and receive love and there is a malfunction when he feels there is a threat to his programmed duty, I think. Jealousy could be more of a factor when considering the way humans feel toward the models. They could survive nuclear warfare, unlike us, and have the ability to do all kinds of things. Other dangers such as extended lifetime and overpopulation is a big factor in considering the environment, and as metals, etc, grow fewer, it may become a waste of our limited resources as a planet. The malfunctions that occur may destroy the population, or they may be used for warfare as killing devices, indestructability is a factor too. The moral obligations are endless, and the notions of 'who programs the robot in terms of morals' and whose morals does it follow (does it follow Muslim, Christian, Aboriginal beliefs? Who calls the shots on how it lives its life? It can't make it's own moral decisions, so which morals are more prevalent and 'better' in society?
What are some of the positives of artificial intelligence?
People are given more capabilities if partially enhanced by the intelligence, and we can explore and venture into more unknowns, but whether this constant urge for new information is a positive is a relative concept as well. Some people definitely believe that a society who venture more safely is a better society.
Steven Spielberg created a dark look at the subject... how could he have changed the film?
Well, why change it? Having an understanding of Spielberg's work, it would be too 'safe' for him to look at the positive light. Less controversial. Also, it is perhaps a less accurate portrayal of the afflictions of artificial intelligence.
Can we trust computers as much as humans?
I believe this question is what Buddhists would describe as 'a question wrongly put'. I think the real question to be asking is, can we trust humans as well as computers, or computers as well as humans?
Can you envisage a time when we will be fused with technology?
We are, and the moral concerns are already popping up around us. The new technology of cyborganetic arms can fulfil 22 of the primary 27 arm functions. Cyborganetic hearts, lungs or even brains... where will this take us? I think it is safer to stop, and have a look at the world around us for 10 seconds without thinking about where we'll go or technology will get ahead of us.
Are we already transhumanists, in that we have technology extensions off our bodies?
As a question with multiple interpretations and meanings, I will say just this: is there a difference between the people who are constantly in flux with new technology and attach it to themselves constantly, and those who have no choice? It's like a magnetic pole. I don't know much about magnetic sciences, but opposites will attract. The orga and the mecha in us will always feel the need to fuse. Does this not make us transhumanists from the dawn of time, and perhaps THIS is why technology advances as it does?
What are some extensions that you think may be more common in the future?
The human race is unpredictable, and no matter what I say will be overthrown with a million more inventive and unnecessary ideas of the future. Hopefully it will be primarily for the benefit of people who suffer injuries and limp palpitations- but then this raises other questions.
An Olympic runner loses his leg in an accident and is given artificial limbs. Is he still eligible to compete?
Do you see this as a positive for human kind?
Ah, no.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Cccccyberspace
While cyberspace should not be confused with real Internet, the term refers to objects and identities which exist within the communication network itself.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Ana Ward in the Virtual World

Exploring Cyberspace!


Tuesday, February 9, 2010
How to animorph?!

Animorphology!


An ocelot combined with a bald eagle to create the bold and fearsome ocegle.Thursday, February 4, 2010
Animal Psychology Quiz
What is your favourite animal?The Black/White Wolf
An animal that is a little bit different, a little bit dark, and a little bit understood but very intelligent and very majestic. Also intuitive and strong in nature.
This is how you see yourself.
What is your second favourite animal?
The Lion
An animal that is quick-witted, strong and very stealthy. One that is clever and ancient in attribute; one that demands respect in majesty and in style. The King of the Jungle.
This is how others see you.
What is your third favourite animal?
The Eagle
An animal that is a high-flyer, sometimes a predator, but not for the fun of it. Smart and bestowed with beautiful wings for the things it does best. A bit of a dreamer, and soft at heart. One to be adored and revered, in the kindest of senses, for it is unlike any other animal.
This is how you really are.
I also like pandas, ocelots, old cats, Wookies and tigers.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
If I were a tree...

I asked Christie what kind of tree I would be, and she said, 'that tree from the Lion King'. Below is the closest I could find.
I like this tree because it branches out and covers all the little African animals who wish to hide there when it rains, or when they need some shade. Some animals could live in there, like a baboon or a cheetah. It stands by itself. It's rather short, but look at the way it branches out- I don't think it's height gets in its way of reaching for the stars.
If I were a car, what car would I be?
Immediately I thought, A 1957 CHEVROLET CORVETTE (beautiful car), then I thought I was more of a truck. Straight lines, direct, faster motor- quicker on the uptake, you see.
I'm not much a fan of chairs. I don't see what a chair can do that a rug and a cushion can't. I have a little boudoir stool in my bedroom that I sometimes sit on when I'm reading, and those squashy couches can be nice, and tub chairs too, but they aren't me. They're too rigid, I think. If I were a pair of glasses, what would I look like?



